MTJ IP log - review for checkpoint review

Sorry Petri,

For EclipseMe – I would include reference to the package in the third party package section. Regarding the initial contribution from IBM and Nokia, please go ahead and reference them the way you have currently. If there are any changes needed in this regard, I’ll get back to you.

Subject to the change with respect to EclipseMe, your IP log is approved.

Thanks,

Janet

From: Petri.J.Virtanen@nokia.com [mailto:Petri.J.Virtanen@nokia.com]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:25 PM
To: janet.campbell@eclipse.org
Subject: RE: MTJ IP log - review for checkpoint review

Janet,

Sorry to disturb you all the time but this ip-log review is very important for use and we need your comments

Br, Petri

From: Virtanen Petri.J (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
Sent: 30 October, 2006 09:37
To: 'ext Janet Campbell'
Subject: RE: MTJ IP log - review for checkpoint review

Janet,

Please provide your comments. We are targeting to go to release review on 8th of Nov (slides should be provided 1st of Nov) and one requirement is to have IP-log reviewed and approved by you (at least I have understood so).

br, petri

From: Virtanen Petri.J (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
Sent: 25 October, 2006 22:26
To: 'ext Janet Campbell'
Subject: RE: MTJ IP log - review for checkpoint review

Sorry Janet. That was copy paste error in my link. Here is the right one

http://eclipse.org/dsdp/mtj/development/mtj-log.csv

My biggest problem has been with the initial contributions from IBM, Nokia and eclipseME. I am not sure how to document them

-petri

From: ext Janet Campbell [mailto:janet.campbell@eclipse.org]
Sent: 25 October, 2006 22:21
To: Virtanen Petri.J (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
Subject: RE: MTJ IP log - review for checkpoint review

Hi Petri,

Unfortunately, the link doesn’t appear to work for me. Here’s a link to an IP Log for a relatively mature project that will give you an idea of what information is included, how the information is presented, and how they are handling changes over time: http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/development/ip_log.html

I’d be happy to look at your link again once it is up and running.

Best regards,

Janet

From: Petri.J.Virtanen@nokia.com [mailto:Petri.J.Virtanen@nokia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:37 AM
To: janet.campbell@eclipse.org
Subject: RE: MTJ IP log - review for checkpoint review

Hi Janet,

I read through the IP-log instructions. One big issue is unclear for me. Like you might remember first thing that we did after MTJ was started was that we request approval for initial contributions from Nokia, IBM and eclipseME. That was done through due diligence and through bugzilla. How those should be documented in IP-log?

I have put them to the list but I am not sure how to fill all fields in contributions section. Could you please take a look our log and give your feedback

http://eclipse.org/dsdp/mtj/development/mtj-log

br, Petri

From: ext Janet Campbell [mailto:janet.campbell@eclipse.org]
Sent: 20 October, 2006 01:50
To: Virtanen Petri.J (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
Cc: Hoikkala Mika (Nokia-TP-MSW/Helsinki)
Subject: RE: MTJ IP log - review for checkpoint review

Hi Petri,

Please see the following document for additional information on the release review:

http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/release-review.php

More information on the requirements associated with the Project Log can be found here:

http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/project-log.php

Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Thanks!

Janet

From: Petri.J.Virtanen@nokia.com [mailto:Petri.J.Virtanen@nokia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:08 AM
To: janet.campbell@eclipse.org
Cc: mika.hoikkala@nokia.com
Subject: MTJ IP log - review for checkpoint review

Hi Janet,

We are targeting to go release review (or checkpoint review) soon. One thing that we should have in place is IP log review with you. How we should go on with that?

Br, Petri